The Patsy Paradigm: The Secret Service in Historical and Modern Assassinations

The United States Secret Service (USSS) has played a pivotal role in American history, particularly in protecting the nation's leaders. However, its involvement in high-profile assassination events has raised significant questions about its actions and potential deep-state connections. Two significant events are examined: the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump in 2024. These events reveal patterns and inconsistencies suggesting deeper involvement and manipulation.

The Kennedy Assassination: Unraveling Security Stripping and Deep State Involvement

On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. The official narrative attributed the assassination to a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald. However, investigations have revealed significant inconsistencies, particularly regarding the actions of the Secret Service.

Crucial to the assassination was the moment when Secret Service agents were ordered to stand down from the presidential limousine, leaving President Kennedy vulnerable to an ambush. Despite the high-risk environment, the Secret Service failed to implement adequate surveillance and protective measures. Winston Lawson, a Secret Service agent with connections to continuity of government (COG) operations, planned the motorcade route through Dealey Plaza. His use of the Doomsday Network during the assassination suggests deep-state coordination. Collaboration between the CIA and the Secret Service in the aftermath of the assassination indicates a coordinated effort to obscure the true nature of the event.

The Trump Assassination Attempt: Exposing Security Failures and Deep-State Manipulation

On July 13, 2024, former President Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. The Secret Service's handling of this incident has been widely criticized, with allegations of security lapses and deep-state involvement.

The Secret Service's Counter Surveillance Division (CSD) failed to perform a typical evaluation of the rally site, leaving it vulnerable to an attack. Initial reports indicated the presence of a van with explosives and a drone operated by the assailant, Thomas Matthew Crooks. However, subsequent reports were contradictory, suggesting a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the truth. Whistleblower claims alleged that Secret Service director Ronald Rowe Jr. personally directed significant cuts to the division's manpower, compromising security. The involvement of high-ranking officials with deep-state backgrounds, such as Alejandro Mayorkas and Ronald Rowe Jr., further implicates a coordinated effort to manipulate the narrative.

Analysis of PSI Profiles: Understanding Manipulation and Brainwashing

Psychological Subjects of Interest (PSIs) have been a recurring theme in political assassinations. Individuals like Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and Thomas Matthew Crooks exhibit patterns of manipulation by intelligence agencies.

From an early age, PSIs are often subjected to manipulation and brainwashing, making them susceptible to influence by intelligence agencies. Intelligence agencies often create false identities and backgrounds for PSIs to obscure their true connections and motives. The presence of doppelgangers in key assassination events, such as the Kennedy assassination and the Trump assassination attempt, suggests a deliberate strategy to create confusion and mislead investigators. The creation of multiple, conflicting narratives around PSIs serves to obfuscate the truth and protect the real orchestrators of these events.

Historical and Contemporary Parallels: The Secret Service's Deep-State Interface

The analysis of both historical and contemporary events reveals a consistent pattern of deep-state manipulation and involvement by the Secret Service. The parallels between the Kennedy assassination and the Trump assassination attempt underscore the recurring role of the Secret Service in security lapses and cover-ups.

The deliberate security stripping and subsequent cover-up during the Kennedy assassination highlight the deep-state orchestration behind the event. Similar security lapses and conflicting reports in the Trump assassination attempt point to a coordinated effort to obscure the truth. The involvement of COG operations in both events suggests a systematic deep-state mechanism at play. The collaboration between the Secret Service and intelligence agencies like the CIA indicates a deeper level of orchestration and manipulation.

Conclusion

The United States Secret Service, tasked with protecting the nation's leaders, has been implicated in significant security lapses and potential deep-state operations in both historical and contemporary assassination events. The patterns of behavior, manipulation of PSIs, and involvement of high-ranking officials with deep-state connections highlight the need for thorough and transparent investigations. By understanding these patterns and exposing the inconsistencies, future political assassinations can be prevented, and accountability within intelligence agencies can be ensured. Addressing these issues is crucial for establishing a more transparent and accountable system, ensuring the safety and integrity of the nation's leadership.

Enhancing Public Safety Through Advance Detection & Reporting

The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump on July 13, 2024, underscores the urgent need for effective strategies to prevent attacks on public figures and the general public. Implementing advance detection and reporting mechanisms is essential for enhancing safety and preventing such incidents.

The Crucial Role of Public Reporting

Public reporting plays a pivotal role in thwarting potential attacks. A study of 325 foiled mass attacks revealed that nearly two-thirds were prevented due to timely tips from the public. This statistic highlights the power of community vigilance and collective responsibility in maintaining public safety.

Identifying Warning Signs

Understanding and recognizing the warning signs of a potential attack is crucial. Instead of focusing on hostile comments or idle threats on social media, attention should be directed toward more concrete indicators of intent and preparation. Key warning signs include:

• Expressed Intentions: Individuals who declare inspiration from previous attacks and feel compelled to act, often documenting their intentions in manifestos or detailed plans.
• Preparatory Actions: Activities such as drafting detailed attack plans, researching methods to maximize casualties, or seeking paramilitary training are significant indicators of potential threats.
• Logistics and Coordination: Efforts to acquire weapons and ammunition, travel for training or reconnaissance, and surveil potential targets are critical red flags.

The Importance of Immediate Action

Timely action is essential when suspicious activities or behaviors are observed. Social media posts that explicitly state intentions to harm or display weapons should be reported to law enforcement immediately. In situations where an attack seems imminent, calling 911 is crucial. For potential plots that are less immediate but still concerning, reaching out to relevant authorities, such as school or workplace officials, or utilizing tip lines provided by agencies like the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, can prevent tragedy.

Discouraging Hoax Threats

Hoax threats are not only disruptive but also dangerous. They waste valuable resources and can prevent genuine threats from being adequately assessed and addressed. Understanding the severe civil and criminal consequences of making false threats is essential. Educating others about the negative impact of such actions and fostering a culture of responsible reporting can mitigate these issues.

Protecting Democratic Institutions

The increasing number of threats against public officials presents a serious challenge to governance and democratic processes. In 2023, the U.S. Capitol Police investigated over 8,000 threat assessment cases involving members of Congress. Additionally, a significant number of election officials have faced threats, leading to resignations and undermining the electoral process. Public cooperation in identifying and reporting threats is vital to protect these officials and ensure the integrity of our democratic institutions.

Conclusion

Preventing attacks through advance detection and reporting is a shared responsibility requiring vigilance, timely action, and a commitment to public safety. Recognizing the warning signs, acting promptly on suspicions, and discouraging hoax threats collectively contribute to a safer environment for everyone. Remember, when in doubt, make the call. Proactive reporting can save lives and enhance the security of our society.

From JFK to Trump: Secret Service, Assassination Attempts, & Continuity of Government (COG)

In the labyrinth of American politics, recent events have spotlighted critical aspects of governance and security mechanisms. This exploration delves into the assassination attempt on President Trump, the role of the Secret Service, and the Continuity of Government (COG) program. Understanding these elements provides insight into the operational complexities and historical context that shape our nation's crisis management strategies.

The Secret Service and Continuity of Government

The assassination attempt on President Trump has highlighted significant concerns regarding the Secret Service's operations. At the center of this controversy is Kimberly Cheel, a Secret Service leader with a notable history, including her involvement in evacuating Vice President Dick Cheney during the 9/11 attacks. During a recent testimony, Cheel unexpectedly mentioned "continuity of government," which raised questions about the broader implications of this term.

The Continuity of Government (COG) program was initially designed during the Cold War to ensure the survival of the federal government in the event of a nuclear attack. This program has since evolved to address various catastrophic scenarios, providing a framework for maintaining government functions during crises.

Biden's Resignation and Democratic Party Dynamics

President Biden's recent resignation due to internal party pressure and his declining mental health has significantly impacted the political landscape. Speculation about Kamala Harris stepping up as the Democratic candidate has been rife. An unusually early debate between Biden and Trump in June—traditionally scheduled for September or October—suggests strategic planning within the Democratic Party to address Biden's resignation and the subsequent transition.

Trump's Assassination Attempt

The assassination attempt on President Trump was a meticulously planned operation involving multiple shooters. This event has raised serious questions about the effectiveness and transparency of the Secret Service. Despite the presence of counter-sniper teams who spotted the shooter 20 minutes before the attack, Trump was allowed to appear at the event, indicating a significant lapse in protocol.

During the incident, a rooftop shooter came alarmingly close to succeeding. Despite this, the event was not shut down, and the shooter was not immediately apprehended. This breach in security protocols has led to calls for a thorough investigation into the Secret Service's actions and the broader security measures in place for protecting the President.

Deep State and Continuity of Government

The concept of the "deep state" refers to a network of power operating beyond the reach of democratic institutions, influencing major events and decisions. The Continuity of Government (COG) program plays a crucial role in this context. Originally conceived to protect the nation's leadership during a nuclear attack, COG has become a critical component of the government's crisis response framework.

Historical Context

1. JFK Assassination: Historical analysis reveals that figures associated with COG were involved in the events surrounding President Kennedy's assassination, highlighting the long-standing influence of these mechanisms.

2. 9/11 Attacks: Kimberly Cheel's role during the 9/11 attacks, when she evacuated Cheney to a COG bunker, underscores the ongoing relevance of the COG program. The attacks served as a catalyst for expanding the COG framework, further entrenching its importance in national security.

Current Political Climate

The assassination attempt on Trump and Biden's resignation are part of a broader pattern of political maneuvering. The deep state's influence permeates both major political parties, shaping events to maintain stability and control. The early debate between Biden and Trump and the assassination attempt highlight the complexities of these strategic decisions.

Media and Public Perception

The media's response to these events has been inconsistent, reflecting the challenges in managing public perception. Transparency and accountability in reporting are crucial for maintaining trust in democratic processes. The Secret Service's handling of the assassination attempt, marked by a lack of clear communication, underscores the need for more rigorous oversight.

Implications for Democracy

The Continuity of Government (COG) program is designed to ensure the stability and functionality of the federal government during crises. However, its potential to lead to temporary measures like martial law emphasizes the importance of maintaining constitutional safeguards. Public awareness and oversight are essential in ensuring that such mechanisms are not misused.

Conclusion

Recent political turmoil underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms in place to protect and maintain our government. The assassination attempt on President Trump, the role of the Secret Service, and the Continuity of Government (COG) program reveal critical aspects of our political system's crisis management capabilities.

By shedding light on these elements, we can foster a more transparent and accountable governance structure. As citizens, it is crucial to stay informed and engaged, ensuring that our democratic processes are upheld even during times of crisis. Understanding the interplay between security measures and political dynamics helps us navigate the complexities of modern governance and safeguard our democratic values.